|
|
| Author |
Message |
cyborg
Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 1102
Location: canada
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 10:46 am Post subject: |
 |
|
it doesnt look photoshoppped to me at all...in other words... it looks good....btw jdrumstick, what kind of guitar is that????
|
|
|
|
|
 |
jdrumstik
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 114
Location: Orange County
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its an Ibanez, Im unsure on teh model, all there stuff is numbered so its hard to keep track of. But its really great sounding guitar. The finsih is clear so you can see the wood grain. Its super ni e for a begginer guitar, and incase you're woundering, its a bass. Its standing on a120W 15inch Rogue I got for about $160 on sale!
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
139.82 KB |
| Viewed: |
1363 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
129.12 KB |
| Viewed: |
1365 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jdrumstik
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 114
Location: Orange County
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
btw I reshot the picutre isht hgiher exposure, cuase I got to much speckle from the Digi cams Blue channel
I also added in a lot of subtle changes, the wall paint is striengtened, the u that holds the neck had an awkardness to it that I fixed, i filled the little orange holders, I darkened the pickups, brightend the nickel, mad etht eguitar more vibrant, changed the gold on the reciever to silver, changed the walls to cool colers, and made the guitar body (not neck) brigther, and straitend out the awkward lighting to the right of the guitar and added in the gradients
|
|
|
|
|
|
gbf1lm
Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
^ that sir is nice, id still play with the lighting abit, but its looks a hell of a lot more natural than the one photsosythisis did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
swanseamale47
Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 1478
Location: Swansea UK
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why not add a shadow to the guitar, and then add your gradient? Wayne
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
85.84 KB |
| Viewed: |
1334 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gbf1lm
Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^ haha thats worse than photosythisis' version
looks awful
you cant do things like that, its not a 2D room. the shadow woudl be on thte other side, be more out of focus, and would be further back, and be further away(off the image area), and be distorted.
you took the light source out, but the light is still coming from somewhere right?? all teh shading in teh picture suggests the light source from that place. jsut bc you delete it doesnt mean you can put the shadow anywhere you want
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
